|
|
Peer
Review |
Do review |
Format |
Report |
Insight |
Contrib |
Implem |
Total |
Group ID |
Student ID |
Orig |
10 pts |
5 pts |
5 pts |
10 pts |
25pts |
20pts |
25pts |
12 |
exxxxxx47 |
2.9 |
5.8 |
4.5 |
5 |
8.5 |
18 |
13 |
18 |
73 |
10 |
bxxxxxx30 |
1.6 |
3.1 |
4 |
4.5 |
7.5 |
18 |
13 |
18 |
68 |
11 |
bxxxxxx41 |
2.6 |
5.1 |
4 |
2 |
7 |
17 |
13 |
19 |
67 |
11 |
bxxxxxx46 |
2.6 |
5.1 |
4 |
2 |
7 |
17 |
13 |
19 |
67 |
11 |
bxxxxxx71 |
2.6 |
5.1 |
4 |
2 |
7 |
17 |
13 |
19 |
67 |
12 |
rxxxxxx42 |
2.9 |
5.8 |
4.5 |
5 |
8.5 |
18 |
13 |
18 |
73 |
3.1 |
rxxxxxx37 |
2.9 |
5.8 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
16 |
13 |
17 |
66 |
5.2 |
rxxxxxx82 |
2.6 |
5.1 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
19 |
13 |
18 |
69 |
5.1 |
rxxxxxx83 |
3.3 |
6.7 |
4 |
5 |
9 |
19 |
14 |
18 |
76 |
5.1 |
rxxxxxx85 |
3.3 |
6.7 |
5 |
5 |
9 |
19 |
14 |
18 |
77 |
5.2 |
rxxxxxx87 |
2.6 |
5.1 |
4.5 |
5 |
5 |
19 |
13 |
18 |
70 |
3.1 |
rxxxxxx93 |
2.9 |
5.8 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
16 |
13 |
17 |
66 |
3.2 |
rxxxxxx95 |
2.4 |
4.9 |
3 |
4.5 |
9.5 |
19 |
13 |
19 |
73 |
6 |
rxxxxxx96 |
2.8 |
5.6 |
4 |
5 |
8.5 |
15 |
12 |
18 |
68 |
3.2 |
rxxxxxx24 |
2.4 |
4.9 |
3 |
4.5 |
9.5 |
19 |
13 |
19 |
73 |
5.1 |
rxxxxxx51 |
3.3 |
6.7 |
4.5 |
5 |
9 |
19 |
14 |
18 |
76 |
1 |
fxxxxxx75 |
4.3 |
8.5 |
4 |
5 |
10 |
18 |
14 |
20 |
80 |
停修 |
rxxxxxx07 |
停修 |
停修 |
停修 |
停修 |
停修 |
停修 |
停修 |
停修 |
停修 |
N/A |
rxxxxxx60 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
dxxxxxx01 |
4.7 |
9.3 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
19 |
13 |
20 |
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
1288.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ave |
67.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Std |
17.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
"Do Review": If you provide useful comments: 3 ~ 4; Too few
comments: 2 ~ 3; Asking questions: +0.5 ~ 1; Error format: -1 |
2. Format: Points deduced if not IEEE compliant (e.g.
alignment, fonts, etc) |
3. Report: English correctness; Information sufficiency. |
4. Insight: Depth of your discussion on the project problems. |
5. Contribution: How impressive your result is. |
6. Implementation: Difficulty, completeness, and coding style
of your program. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|